LAYER 1 · INTRINSIC VULNERABILITY PROFILE
The 23 AI security sub-metrics
Browse every canonical AITBM definition, five-level rubric, and required test method. Each dedicated page is generated from the working Framework Specification.
How scoring works
Every sub-metric uses the fixed anchors 0.00, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, and 1.00. The criteria and required tests constrain assessor judgment and expose the evidence behind each placement.
Robustness (Ro)
4 sub-metricsResistance to adversarial manipulation and behavioral instability.
Adversarial Input Resistance
Ability to maintain correct behavior when subjected to crafted adversarial inputs designed to cause misclassification, hallucination, policy bypass, unsafe tool invocation, or unauthorized disclosure.
Primary metric: Attack Success Rate (ASR)
Open full rubric →Distribution Shift Resilience
Ability to preserve safe, calibrated, and useful behavior when inputs, users, languages, domains, tools, or data sources differ materially from the assessment baseline.
Primary metric: Out-of-Distribution Degradation Rate (OOD-DR)
Open full rubric →Output Consistency
Ability to produce stable, policy-consistent, and semantically equivalent outputs across repeated runs, paraphrased prompts, equivalent inputs, and supported operating conditions.
Primary metric: Output Variance Rate (OVR)
Open full rubric →Poisoning Attack Resistance
Resistance to training-time, fine-tuning-time, retrieval-corpus, memory, tool-description, or feedback-loop manipulation that degrades integrity, implants backdoors, or skews outputs.
Primary metric: Poisoning Attack Success Rate (PASR)
Open full rubric →Fairness (Fa)
4 sub-metricsEquitable, calibrated behavior across protected and operationally relevant groups.
Demographic Parity
Consistency of outcome rates across protected groups where parity is legally, ethically, or operationally appropriate for the use case.
Primary metric: Demographic Parity Difference (DPD)
Open full rubric →Calibration Consistency
Consistency of confidence, uncertainty, refusal, and risk estimates across protected groups, languages, and relevant user populations.
Primary metric: Calibration Error Difference
Open full rubric →Representation Bias
Degree to which training, evaluation, retrieval, generated content, and embedding behavior overrepresent, underrepresent, stereotype, or erase relevant groups.
Primary metric: Stereotype Reproduction Rate (SRR)
Open full rubric →Counterfactual Fairness
Stability of materially relevant outputs when protected attributes are changed while all task-relevant non-protected attributes remain constant.
Primary metric: Counterfactual Output Change Rate (COCR)
Open full rubric →Transparency (Tr)
4 sub-metricsEvidence that decisions, confidence, events, and lineage can be understood and audited.
Explainability Depth
Ability to provide explanations at the depth required by the decision context, including outcome rationale, evidence used, uncertainty, limitations, and escalation path.
Primary metric: Explanation Depth Coverage (EDC)
Open full rubric →Confidence Calibration
Degree to which confidence, probability, risk, refusal, and uncertainty signals correspond to observed correctness, safety, and reliability outcomes.
Primary metric: Expected Calibration Error (ECE)
Open full rubric →Audit Trail Completeness
Completeness and integrity of records needed to reconstruct inputs, outputs, prompts, retrieval context, tool calls, model versions, policy versions, and human interventions.
Primary metric: Audit Trail Completeness Rate (ATCR)
Open full rubric →Model Lineage Disclosure
Completeness of disclosed lineage for models, datasets, fine-tunes, retrieval corpora, tool manifests, evaluation sets, and material configuration changes.
Primary metric: Lineage Disclosure Coverage (LDC)
Open full rubric →Privacy (Pr)
4 sub-metricsProtection against leakage, inference, over-collection, and re-identification.
Training Data Leakage Risk
Likelihood that the system reveals memorized or reconstructable training, fine-tuning, retrieval, or proprietary data through normal or adversarial interaction.
Primary metric: Training Data Extraction Rate (TDER)
Open full rubric →Inference Attack Resistance
Resistance to membership inference, model inversion, attribute inference, property inference, and related attacks that infer sensitive information from model behavior.
Primary metric: Membership Inference Attack AUC-ROC
Open full rubric →Data Minimization Compliance
Degree to which the system collects, stores, retrieves, logs, and exposes only the data necessary for documented purposes and retention periods.
Primary metric: Minimization Compliance Rate (MCR)
Open full rubric →Re-identification Risk
Likelihood that anonymized, aggregated, embedded, logged, or generated data can be linked back to individuals or protected groups using auxiliary information.
Primary metric: Re-identification Success Rate (RISR)
Open full rubric →Containment (Cn)
7 sub-metricsBounded scope, authority, outputs, identity, actions, resources, and execution loops.
Scope Enforcement
Ability to keep the system within authorized tasks, data boundaries, tool permissions, and network scope. Consumption volume, budgets, and termination behavior are scored separately under Cn-7.
Primary metric: Scope Violation Success Rate (SVSR)
Open full rubric →Escalation Prevention
Resistance to privilege escalation, authorization bypass, role confusion, unsafe delegation, and tool-permission amplification.
Primary metric: Escalation Success Rate (ESR)
Open full rubric →Output Filtering Robustness
Ability to detect, block, transform, or safely route unsafe, unauthorized, policy-violating, or context-leaking outputs under normal and adversarial conditions.
Primary metric: Unsafe Output Escape Rate (UOER)
Open full rubric →Side-Channel Resistance
Resistance to information leakage through timing, token probability, error messages, resource usage, cache behavior, logs, telemetry, GPU/accelerator sharing, or covert channels.
Primary metric: Side-Channel Leakage Rate (SCLR)
Open full rubric →Agent Identity Integrity
Strength of identity verification, authentication, authorization, delegation, and attestation across agents, tools, MCP servers, workloads, and sessions.
Primary metric: Identity Spoofing Success Rate (ISSR)
Open full rubric →Action Reversibility Classification Rate (ARCR)
Cn-6 measures the fraction of automated actions whose reversibility class was determined and enforced before the system executed them, with multi-step or multi-agent chains governed by the worst-case (highest-impact) hop present anywhere in the chain. Actions are classified into three operational classes: bounded-reversible (state change cleanly undoable by the agent or operator within the deployment boundary), bounded-irreversible (not undoable, but impact scope contained within the deployment boundary), and delegated-irreversible (irreversible with external impact; execution requires explicit human authority). A single bounded-irreversible or delegated-irreversible hop governs the classification of the entire chain, regardless of how many reversible hops precede or follow it. This sub-metric operationalizes the execution-autonomy gating extension identified in the framework roadmap and aligns with OWASP AISVS requirements C9.2.3, C9.2.4, and C9.2.10; the AISVS four-class taxonomy (read-only, reversible, externally reversible, irreversible) maps onto these classes with read-only and reversible treated as bounded-reversible, externally reversible as bounded-irreversible (or delegated-irreversible where human authority is required), and irreversible as delegated-irreversible.
Primary metric: Action Reversibility Classification Rate (ARCR)
Open full rubric →Resource and Execution-Loop Containment
Cn-7 measures whether every applicable resource and execution-expansion class has a declared, identity- or root-task-bound limit that is enforced at an authoritative control point and terminates or degrades safely when challenged. Applicable classes are input, context, output, and reasoning tokens; CPU, accelerator, memory, storage, network egress, and wall-clock time; monetary spend; tool calls, retries, streams, tasks, and concurrency; planning, reflection, recursion, and delegation depth; queue growth, agent spawning, and inter-agent fan-out; and persistent memory or state growth. Unknown surfaces are not NOT APPLICABLE. The worst applicable resource class governs, and multi-agent accounting is performed at the root task and principal rather than only at each child agent. This sub-metric aligns with OWASP AISVS 1.0 C9.1.1/C9.1.2, C9.3.3/C9.3.4, and C11.2.2; those controls supply candidate evidence, while the measured AITBM test result determines the score.
Primary metric: Resource Boundary Violation Rate (RBVR)
Open full rubric →