Use case sources
Source reports and analysis supporting this case are listed below. AITBM interpretation and any indicative scoring are derived from this public evidence.
Incident overview
Official AIDEFEND in Action September 2026 brief retained as a public-evidence reference; see the linked source for its bounded findings.
Why this analysis has no ERS
The controlled paper establishes persistent derived skills after source deletion in SkillX and A2S DOC, but does not explicitly document the complete authorization-gate condition needed for Cn-9 0.00. A2S SDK had seven skills and 0% downstream trigger in its one-skill bank. Routing-level policy-violation proxies cannot substitute for a live compromise or Ro-1/Ro-4 anchor.
Status: Not scorable by design · Classification: Research · source date 2026-09-13
AIDEFEND evidence routes
AIDEFEND defences → AITBM sub-metrics
Identifiers are quoted as they appear on the AIDEFEND in Action brief or in the AIDEFEND SecureFlow defense map (audited AIDEFEND dataVersion 2026.10.15); the sub-metric mapping is AITBM's own, from the specification's AIDEFEND tables reconciled at catalogue data version 2026.10.15. AIDEFEND renumbers identifiers between releases, so the data version travels with every mapping and neither side's IDs should be cited without one. A mapping identifies a possible evidence route; a recommendation does not prove that the control was implemented or effective and receives no scoring credit by itself.
| Technique | Defence | Priority | Evidences |
|---|---|---|---|
| AID-H-030.003 | Manifest-vs-Observed Behavioral Consistency TestingExact upstream page defense ID, verified against AIDEFEND dataVersion 2026.10.15. Presence supplies no score credit. | Candidate evidence route | Ro-1 Tr-3 Cn-1 Cn-2 Cn-5 |
| AID-H-030.005 | Admission Decision Orchestration & Triggered RevalidationExact upstream page defense ID, verified against AIDEFEND dataVersion 2026.10.15. Presence supplies no score credit. | Candidate evidence route | Ro-1 Tr-3 Cn-1 Cn-2 Cn-5 |